Blog Post

Blog

Cohabitation law reforms rejected

Leigh Kent • Dec 30, 2022

The government has rejected proposals to modernise cohabitation laws in England and Wales, leaving it up to individuals to arrange their financial affairs for partners and dependants.

In August, the House of Commons Women and Equalities Committee published The rights of cohabiting partners for England and Wales (Scotland and Northern Ireland have their own laws). Amidst all the other political excitement of that month, the report received little coverage.


The lack of media attention was a pity, as the Committee made some important recommendations about a significant proportion of the population – the one in five couples who have chosen cohabitation rather than marriage or civil partnership. The report noted that “Whereas married couples and civil partners have certain legal rights and responsibilities upon divorce or death, cohabitants receive, in general, inferior protections”. This fact is compounded by what the report called the “common law marriage myth” – the erroneous belief that after a certain amount of time of living together, the law treats cohabitants as if they were married.


The report made six recommendations for action, only one of which was accepted in full by the government. The following three proposals were rejected outright:


  • Family Law should be reformed to better protect cohabiting couples and their children from financial hardship in the event of separation. A potential structure for such reform was proposed by the Law Commission in 2007, which having ignored for so long the government now says is too old to be implemented without a review or fresh consultation.
  • The intestacy rules should be immediately redrawn to recognise cohabitation. The Committee again supported ideas put forward by the Law Commission (this time from 2011). The government’s rejection of any intestacy reform was largely predicated on the notion that cohabiting couples could make wills to deal with their estates.
  • The inheritance tax regime should be the same for cohabiting partners as it currently is for married couples and civil partners. This was rejected by the Treasury – the responsible government department – which said it “has no plans at present to extend the longstanding treatment of spouses and civil partners to cohabiting partners.”


If you are cohabiting, the government’s message is clear: make your own legal and financial arrangements – and don’t believe that common law marriage myth. 


Notes: The Financial Conduct Authority does not regulate tax, wills or estate planning advice. Tax treatment varies according to individual circumstances and is subject to change. The Financial Conduct Authority does not regulate tax advice.

by Leigh Kent 17 Apr, 2024
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) has been shuffling its shopping basket.
by Leigh Kent 09 Jan, 2024
The National Insurance cut for employees took effect on 6 January 2024.
by Leigh Kent 15 Nov, 2023
The rise in mortgage rates since early 2022 has taken its toll on house prices.
by Leigh Kent 16 Aug, 2023
Rising mortgage rates pose some difficult questions for one of the major providers of housing finance.
by Leigh Kent 23 May, 2023
Many life insurance providers now offer additional ‘perks’ to policyholders but are they worth it?
by Elliot Bolt 19 May, 2023
How do life insurance companies decide if I am a smoker? What about vapers? How can I find the best cover?
by Leigh Kent 05 May, 2023
If you are self-employed, the new tax year may be longer than you think.
by Leigh Kent 08 Feb, 2023
When it comes to student loans, the media focus is usually on tuition fees (outside Scotland), but there’s another loan that shouldn’t be overlooked – and that includes Scotland.
by Leigh Kent 11 Jan, 2023
If your employer pays for the fuel in your company car, it may cost you more than you expect.
by Leigh Kent 14 Nov, 2022
Nearly all children born between 1 September 2002 and 2 January 2011 were the recipients of a government handout – usually £250 or £500 – which was locked away in a Child Trust Fund (CTF). CTFs were introduced by the Chancellor at the time, Gordon Brown, with the worthy idea that every child would have some savings to their name when they reached the age of 18. It was hoped that parents and others would make regular top ups to the modest government payment to increase these coming-of-age funds. Like so many other well-intentioned resolutions, the CTF scheme was far from successful. The initial government payment was sent as a voucher to the child’s parent or guardian. If the vouchers were not used to open a CTF within 12 months, HMRC was left to open a default CTF for the child, with the CTF provider selected at random from an accredited list. No less than 30% of CTFs were opened this way. In 2010, the poor take up of CTFs encouraged the new Chancellor George Osborne to make a significant cut to payments. Eventually, from the beginning of 2011, the scheme was closed, albeit payments into existing CTFs, by parents for instance, were allowed to continue. By then there were 6.3 million children with CTFs. The latest detailed data from HMRC (from April 2021) revealed the total investment in CTFs, at that time, as nearing £10.5 billion, with more than four in five of them having a value of under £2,500. (The average value in April 2021 was £1,911 and is currently sitting around £2,100). HMRC now faces the opposite problem to the one it encountered at the start, when parents overlooked this new investment opportunity: CTF pots are not being claimed by 18 year olds. To quote a recent HMRC press release, “Tens of thousands of teenagers in the UK who have not yet claimed their matured Child Trust Funds savings could have thousands of pounds waiting for them”. It is likely that many teenagers (and their parents) have forgotten or were unaware of the CTF’s existence, especially if it was set up by default. To trace a CTF, go to https://www.gov.uk/child-trust-funds/find-a-child-trust-fund . CTFs were replaced by Junior ISAs, which stand more chance of being remembered at age 18 as they must be established by parents or guardians and do not involve any direct government contributions.
Show More
Share by: